| |
 |
| Fort New Amsterdam
in 1626 28, earliest known view of New Amsterdam; Amsterdam,
1651. |
By the end of the 17th century, all of New Netherland
had become the possession of the British crown. Yet the maps of
the region still reflect the original Dutch settlements. Brooklyn,
Hoboken, Block Island and hundreds more places take their names
from the first Dutch colonists. These names hint at the early Dutch
role in establishing our nation, an involvement that continued through
to the American Revolution.
New Netherland's Influence
The 1664 British capture of New Amsterdam and New Netherland in
peacetime was one of the sparks that ignited the second Anglo-Dutch
war. The English would pay dearly for their 1664 incursion, but
the return of New Netherland to Dutch control was not among the
conflict's peace terms as decided in Breda in 1667. The New Netherlanders
would have to wait another five years for a brief reunion with their
former mother country.
The second Anglo-Dutch war ended with the Peace of Breda in July
1667. The Netherlands had placed a stranglehold upon England, nearly
bankrupting King Charles II, and finally sending a fleet up the
Thames, through the Medway and on to Chatham, laying waste to shoreline
warehouses on the Thames and the Chatham Naval Yard, and sending
London into a panic. The ensuing blockade drew London's commerce
to a standstill for the first half of the summer of 1667, virtually
drying up Charles II's revenue. The subsequent Peace of Breda released
Holland's grip on British commerce, gave the Dutch Suriname on coastal
South America and some other concessions, but did not return New
Netherland. The follow-on "Triple Alliance" of 1668, between
England, Sweden and Holland, supposedly reaffirmed cooperation between
these three Protestant states.
Charles II's humiliation was so thorough, however, that within
two years he entered into a secret alliance with France's Louis
XIV to once and for all, crush the Dutch Republic. Over 100,000
French soldiers invaded The Netherlands and rapidly captured a succession
of cities and provinces, all the way up to, and including, Utrecht.
A joint English French seaborne invasion fleet, however, was stymied
at sea by Dutch naval fleets, and never affected the activity on
land. What was worse for England, was that Charles II' was about
to see his revenue sources dry up suddenly and this would directly
affect the outcome of the new war.
After the disastrous (in the eyes of the British) end of the second
Anglo-Dutch war, the merchant community (whose warehouses had been
destroyed) could not nearly provide sufficient tax support to the
British crown. Charles II's remaining revenue depended first on
the Virginia tobacco trade, second, upon taxes and duties from the
New World, and thirdly from revenue derived from the Newfoundland
fisheries. The Dutch would swiftly move to end all three.
In July of 1673 a combined Dutch fleet under Cornelius
Evertsen and Jacob Benckes captured almost half of the annual Virginia
tobacco fleet, and sank or scuttled half of the remainder. They
then sailed north and quickly recaptured New Netherland, and proceeded
to lay waste to the coastal fishing towns in Newfoundland. For additional
detail see "The
Legacy of Peter Stuyvesant". All British
ships in the former New York (now renamed New Orange) were captured.
British merchantmen that could escape Boston, quickly did so, as
rumors of an incredibly large Dutch fleet spread throughout New
England. The Newfoundland fishing grounds were effectively shut
down, while trade and commercial activity ceased. Most importantly,
Charles II's revenue stream ground to a halt. From the perspective
of the British crown, the whole of North America was threatened.
Charles II couldn't release the fleets guarding the Thames for
fear of a repeat performance of 1667, and the Dutch, in fact, tried
to capture Sheerness at the mouth of the Thames again in 1672, but
this time its defenses had been improved. The few reports that were
received from the New World probably exaggerated the scope of the
disaster, but New Netherland was again firmly in Dutch hands, and
the reality of revenue loss was certain. When the first ship sent
to inform the Dutch back at home was inadvertently intercepted and
captured by the English, Charles realized the extent of the losses
and more importantly, could take advantage of a window of opportunity
to conclude a peace with the Netherlands before the full impact
of their victory in the New World could be realized by the Dutch
negotiators.
The French, poised on the outskirts of Amsterdam, had been temporarily
halted by the defenders breaking open the dikes and flooding the
fields through which the armies had to cross. When the Treaty of
Westminster was signed in 1674, English support of the French disappeared
and France advanced no further, eventually withdrawing. Thus The
Netherlands and the House of Orange were saved, but the New Netherland
settlement again reverted to British control.
Fourteen years later, when William of Orange triumphantly accepted
the British throne in the aftermath of the Glorious Revolution,
Dutchmen again assumed control of New Netherland, this time under
Protestant Jacob Leisler. William of Orange, however, interested
in securing peace and cooperation among the English, allowed control
of New Netherland to revert to their corrupt former governor, and
in 1691, Leisler's rebellion, or King William's war, ended with
the English again in authority over the region.
Having changed hands five times within a quarter century, the region's
inhabitants were poised for the sixth change of control for the
next two or three generations. This stimulated the former Dutch
and English inhabitants to treat each other with enhanced respect,
civility, and cooperation, greatly extending the length of Dutch
influence in the New York area. Families such as the van Rensselaers,
having survived the five transitions intact, wielded unusual influence
well into the next two centuries.
The Dutch love for tolerance, free enterprise, free trade, and
freedom of religion soon became entwined into the Colonial psyche
that set the foundation for the American spirit of 1776. The "Apology"
of William the Silent of Orange to Philip of Spain in 1581 blueprinted
the Declaration of Independence that followed almost two hundred
years later, and the Dutch Republic that William headed was the
only model available for the American patriots to follow. Thus its
preservation in the latter half of the 1600s would keep the model
intact for Franklin, Paine, Jefferson Adams, and Washington's benefit.
Some provisions of the surrender documents of Peter Stuyvesant
in 1664 (e.g. prohibiting the quartering of soldiers in civilian
homes) even found their way into the Constitution of the United
States over 100 years later. What began with Henry Hudson's Halve
Maen in 1609 ended up fully integrating into and inordinately influencing
the future United States of America, while simultaneously contributing
to the preservation of the House of Orange-Nassau and the Kingdom
of The Netherlands.
Blueprint for the Bill of Rights
The British frigate Guinea along with three other warships
entered the lower Hudson river in late August, 1664, and demanded
that Peter Stuyvesant's surrender New Netherland. The unprovoked,
peacetime attack on New Amsterdam by Colonel Richard Nicolls, acting
under orders from James, Duke of York, placed the English in control
over New Netherland. Colonel Nicolls was a polished, able officer,
who spoke Dutch well and was charged to treat the inhabitants "with
all humility and gentleness," with the objective of securing
a peaceful conquest without unnecessary bloodshed.
Stuyvesant at one point said that he "...would much rather
be carried out dead," but the townspeople pieced together the
surrender terms that he had torn to bits, and along with the clergy,
prevailed upon him to accept English occupation. (See The
Legacy of Peter stuyvesant for more detail on the capture
(and later re-capture) of New Netherland).
Colonel Nicolls, cognizant of his precarious legal position (peacetime
attacks were considered nothing less than pure piracy) made the
situation more palatable by allowing the garrison to march out of
the fort, matches lit, and "with their arms, drums beating,
and colors flying." In addition Nicolls said that his capture
was "subject to negotiations with the home governments."
But what placated most, were the surrender terms themselves.
The Articles
of Capitulation on the Reduction of New Netherland
were filled with extraordinary generosity for their time. They had
the (un)intended objective of securing a list of conditions that
conferred rights upon the populace unheard of in those times. The
irony, from a historical standpoint, is that the Dutch (and ex-Dutch)
now would enjoy greater rights under the English Crown than those
of any of the other colonial settlements, and many of these privileges,
in one form or another, would last through the twentieth century!!!
The following year, Colonel Nicolls expanded upon these articles
and promulgated a code of civil and criminal law called the "Dukes
Laws," which added the right of jury trials and required two
or more witnesses or confession of the accused, before the death
penalty could be imposed.
When the Dutch recaptured New Netherland in July, 1673, and renamed
it New Orange, the same rights were reiterated and upheld.
After the Treaty of Westminster returned the settlement to England
in November of 1674, the new governor, Edmund Andros, guaranteed
that the residents of New Netherland again would have "...the
same right, privilege and freedom which the said residents enjoyed
before the ... war." In addition, the departing Dutch governor,
Anthony Colve, got Andros to agree to eleven further articles, reasserting
religious freedom and freedom from impressment, and assorted property
rights for the inhabitants.
In 1683, New York representative assembly recodified the surrender
documents and additions over the years into the "Charter of
Libertyes and Priveleges." where for the first time the phrase
"by due Course of Law" appeared. The Charter, signed by
the Duke of York, was abrogated when the Duke became king as James
II. But Jacob Leisler effectively reinstated them during Leisler's
Rebellion or King William's War (1689-1691) as the colonial reaction
to the Glorious Revolution was called. New Netherland basically
had changed hands again for three years, and fell under Leisler
and his Protestant rule, awaiting the triumphant blessing of William
III of Orange, the Dutch Stadholder who succeeded to the English
throne.
William's blessing never came, as Andros, who had fled to Britain,
petitioned the new monarch to assist in an orderly return of New
York/New Netherland to the crown. William did just that, not knowing
that "King William's war" had been fought against the
corrupt Andros, and for the Protestant William. Andros accepted
the Charter's reinstatement, as did his replacement, Governor Benjamin
Fletcher. King William, however, declared the laws invalid in 1697,
but Fletcher's replacement, the Earl of Bellomont in 1698 brought
the former supporters of Leisler back into power, and with them
came adherence to the same rights and freedoms again.
In the next century, when the American Revolution's success prompted
adoption of a new Constitution, it was the New York delegation,
under their able, yet anti-federalist governor George Clinton, that
insisted on passage of the first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights,
before they would grudgingly agree to ratify the new constitution.
Having spent the last century living under laws directly descended
from the Stuyvesant surrender terms, the New York representatives
would not tolerate anything less than the freedoms that we, today,
have taken for granted.
|
|